Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close

Throwing the football without regard for the consequences it may bring has become the rage in the National Football League.

Quarterbacks are posting numbers that belie the difficulty of playing the position and records are going up in flames. Although many people continue to accurately call the NFL a passing league, I see a league in a state of philosophical flux.

Teams are returning to the concept of a balanced offense in the name of winning games. The Houston Texans and the New England Patriots lead the league in rushing attempts, respectively, and both teams are in the running for a Super Bowl appearance. Although many teams aren't experiencing the success the Texans and Patriots are in the win-loss column, one thing is clear: running the football well helps to win games and is making a comeback.

But this Hammer & Cudgel brand of football speaks more to personnel than it does to any particular philosophy or axiom of the game. Offensive coordinators and head coaches are coming to the realization they can't turn Joe Normal into Peyton (or Eli) Manning, Drew Brees, Aaron Rodgers or Tom Brady. It's not the passing tree that works, it's the person throwing the ball that makes it work and when I say "work" I mean win games.

And that's why this philosophy is reappearing; It's no longer about winning the hearts and minds of owners, analysts and fantasy football fans, it's about winning games. You can't look like a genius running the football and too many coordinators and head coaches have concerned themselves with looking like a genius instead of just winning football games.

There are quarterbacks in the league that are posting career numbers and having success but they're not winning games. They may throw for 300+ yards but turnovers typically come with prolific passing numbers and those turnovers lose games. Head coaches are swallowing their pride and realizing balance may be the best way to go after all -- especially if you have a defense.

This rushing renaissance, this newfound balance in the game is spearheaded by the NFC West, the most brutal division in football. The Arizona Cardinals should embrace this truth and adapt.

In a gross simplification of the facts, the San Francisco 49ers went to an NFC Championship Game by rushing the football, using play-action, protecting the football and letting their defense and special teams win games for them. And although they have made a QB change in the Bay, they are repeating the same formula and winning games again this year.

Seattle ripped off Jim Harbaugh and is doing the same thing in the sound. The Seahawks have rushed the ball almost 400 times this season while only allowing Russell Wilson to throw the ball 317 times. Wilson is not putting up gaudy numbers but he is playing extremely well in a balanced attack that features Marshawn Lynch and…he's winning games. Seattle's defense is potent and their special teams, like San Francisco, are a strength.

Jeff Fisher sees talent in Sam Bradford but refuses to let the kid carry the burden of throwing the ball 45 times a game. The Rams have a balanced approach in St. Louis and run the ball better than they throw it. This is Jeff Fisher creed, a belief they have the pieces to compete with anyone in the league if they protect the ball and don't expose their QB to error. Fish keeps Bradford in a three-dimensional, balanced attack where he can protect the football and let their improving defense compete.

The Cardinals have the defensive core to build around for years to come and should mimic what the rest of the division is doing. Calais Campbell, Daryl Washington, Patrick Peterson, Sam Acho and Dan Williams give the Cardinals a chance to be an excellent defense year-in and year-out.

And having an excellent defense is critical to the balanced attack philosophy. It doesn't make sense to run the ball if your defense is giving up points on the other end. All that does is shorten the game, reduce your margin of error, and make every possession seem like a do-or-die proposition in the second-halves of games.

Suddenly, if you have a defense, finding Peyton Manning doesn't seem to be the end-all-be-all of an organization. Teams can use quarterbacks that are serviceable. Teams can win with Q's that know how to protect the football and have good play-action mechanics. Teams don't have to find rare talent at the QB position and this changes the philosophy of the entire organization.

If Big Red can draft a LT and move Levi Brown to RG in 2013, they could improve their offensive line tenfold. Brown is still the Cardinals best run-blocker and if he has the feet to play LT -- which he does -- holding up in protection at guard would be a given. This move would certainly stabilize the interior of the Cardinals offense, improve the running game and allow a capable quarterback to prosper.

Yes, the Cardinals need to find a QB (so do 20 other teams in the league). But, if Kevin Kolb could have stayed healthy and continued to play at the level he was in the first four weeks of the season (and that's a big if), I believe the Cardinals would be 7-5 at the very minimum, beating Minnesota, Atlanta and NY.

I don't say this to make excuses for the Cardinals; they lost those games, are 4-8 and in troubled waters. I say this to prove my point: the Cardinals don't have to find the next Kurt Warner, Joe Normal will do.

23 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    the cooker wrote...
    The problem is!
    The problem is that the organization does not exactly have a record of signing a QB that can throw a ball and hit Tempe Townlake.
  • Abuse
    DanTheTimid wrote...
    Good analysis as usual
    I completely agree, but the real trick is actually getting that LT. Brown is a perfect example of what happens when a team becomes so obsessed with getting a LT that they ignore the best available player and take the best available LT, even if the best available LT really isn't that good. There has to be a LT worth taking when the Cards pick comes around or all we'll be doing is wasting a 1st round pick on another Massie/Brown level tackle and likely passing up on another adrian peterson level of talent at another position.
  • Abuse
    DanTheTimid wrote...
    Also
    I want to note that I'm not unhappy with the balance the Cards have had this year, have they been a bit pass happy at times, yes, but its been warranted. If your run games not generating more then -4 to +2 yards a rush the opposing team has no reason to respect the rush, they'll just take the downs you give away and not even bat an eye when you try to play action pass. LSH's play has given us a little hope, as is the improvement of Massie and Porter, but Wells looks like the yearly injuries have ended his career before it began.
  • Abuse
    SurpriseMe wrote...
    QB Try out
    Talk has it a QB tried out for Whiz on Friday. Who was it? Does anyone know?
  • Abuse
    DanTheTimid wrote...
    As for Williams
    Who the heck knows what we have in Williams, guy some how has proven more injury prone then Wells, and that's quite an accomplishment. The point I'm getting at is that its easy to say a balanced offense would compliment this defense, I think most people would agree with that sentiment, the problem is we're a LONG way from having the pieces necessary to effectively run, and if you can't run effectively, you really might as well not run at all.
  • Abuse
    DanTheTimid wrote...
    One final thing
    Its worth noting that for all the flack the cards have gotten for passing on adrian peterson for Brown, RB is one of those positions like WR, reliant on other positions. In the case of WR they are reliant on you having a QB who can actually get them the ball. With RB, a RB's talent is almost completely negated if they don't have a line who can at least open some small holes for them to squeeze through. Cards didn't and don't have a line that can do that, so no saying AP wouldn't have flopped had we taken him of no fault of his own.
  • Abuse
    FitzIsMyHero wrote...
    @ Wolf
    Having a balanced offense to be successful couldnt be anymore obvious especially after you lose Warner. Beefing up on talent for the running attack should have been their first priority, even when Warner was still Quarterbacking. Again, another Whisenhunt misjudgment.
  • Abuse
    FitzIsMyHero wrote...
    @ Wolf
    Im sitting here watching the Cards trail SEA 45-0. In my opinion it hasnt been a matter of "if" Whisenhunt will get fired. Its been a matter of "when" he will be fired. P.S. Im going to the DET and CHI games at UPH. I've never been to a Buffalo Bills game in Buffalo, but, Im assuming this is what it feels like. :/
  • Abuse
    mtj8nau wrote...
    Hey Wolf...
    Does your buddy Wiz still have a job? Would you still not fire him? How many losses does he get before you change your job? 10 in a row? 20? 30? I can't wait to hear Wolf defend Wiz tomorrow...
  • Abuse
    foodshipnine wrote...
    lol
    This is hilarious. the emotions are FLYING as they do when your team gets crunched by a division rival. So you go ahead and fire Whiz.... Do you believe that a new Head coach is going to make our QB's better? Are they going to start building offensive strategies around bad QB's? what's the solution there? run the ball? A firing of Whiz sounds more like a punishment than a solution. might as well bend Whiz over your knee and give him a spanking for the losses. Besides, who isn't now looking toward the draft. I was after Kolb got injured.
close

Share: