Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close
jaypaterno.JPG
Jay Paterno and other members of the Paterno family are making the rounds, questioning the findings of the Freeh Report.
The Paterno family is trying to restore the legacy of Joe Paterno and have responded to the Freeh Report by former FBI Director, Louis Freeh. The family conducted their own investigation and maintains that Joe Pa was not complicit in a cover-up of child sexual abuse by former assistant Jerry Sandusky.

"The Freeh Report reflects an improper 'rush to injustice,'" the Paterno family critique says. "There is no evidence that Joe Paterno deliberately covered up known incidents of child molestation by Jerry Sandusky to protect Penn State football or for any other reason; the contrary statements in the Freeh report are unsupported and unworthy of belief."

Unworthy of belief, indeed.

I have great compassion for the Paterno family because they must be confused themselves. They know and believe Joe Pa would never do anything like cover up and suppress evidence with such serious implications as the rape of a child or abuse of other children. I have compassion for them because they want to remember their father for all the good he did and not for what he did; or, in this case, what he didn't do.

The family is focusing on the wrong thing.

It's not the Freeh Report. When it comes to the legacy of Joe Paterno you can take everything in that report and throw it out the window. None of it matters to me.

Joe Pa's legacy was destroyed the moment he made the decision to pursue justice by not going directly to the police, the proper authorities. Joe Pa had a sobbing Mike McQueary in his office, recounting what he had seen Sandusky do to a boy in the showers. That's where this story begins and ends.

What do rational, intelligent, unencumbered human beings do when somebody tells them they witnessed a man murdering a boy's heart in the showers?

The first thing they do is say, "What!" The second thing they do is pick the phone up and call police -- the real police! You don't tell your superiors and expect them to handle the situation. You immediately call the police and hand the phone to McQueary. Immediately!!

And this is why Joe Pa will always be respected in the Wolfley Compound as a football coach that made a tragic mistake but not revered as a man: if it was his grandson being sodomized in the showers that day, would he have said, "What!" and then called the police?

Yes.

If Joe Paterno answered that question by saying, "no, I would have handled it exactly the same way" he is the Devil incarnate.

Ron Wolfley, Co-host of Doug & Wolf

7 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    johnnyb588 wrote...
    McQueary's testimony...
    Wasn't exactly as clear as reports seem to have indicated. I do not sympathize whatsoever with Jerry Sandusky. What he did is just about as vile as possible. But much has been assumed about what Paterno (as well as McQueary, Curley, and Schultz) knew and when he knew it. I do sympathize with the other men involved in a possible cover up because they have been assumed guilty by a bloodthirsty mob with the benefit of hindsight. They might be guilty of a cover up (and I would bet they are), but I am not positive of it.
  • Abuse
    johnnyb588 wrote...
    Just to clarify...
    And so I don't get lambasted by those who don't know what McQueary actually testified, here is an excerpt of him saying what he saw. "Looked in the mirror and shockingly and surprisingly saw Jerry with a boy in the shower. And it appeared that Jerry was directly behind the boy and the boy was up against the wall with his hands against the wall. Again, that glance or that look may have been a second or two." I know this is a horrible scene, so it's tough to read, but McQueary's testimony isn't nearly as cut and dry as what many make it out to be, and WHO KNOWS what he told Paterno?
  • Abuse
    azgbayfan wrote...
    Don't agree
    Wolf I like your show BUT, where you get off being some sort of expert on what someone should or shouldn't have done in something as disgusting as what took place at Penn State? You are of course entitled to your opinion but as far as I am concerned you have ZERO right to say that someone was wrong until you can you put yourself in his shoes. You obviously weren't there, you don't know the circumstances and you are not entitled to anything other than your opinion. Your rush to judgement is as bad as the NCAA's
  • Abuse
    Whatashame wrote...
    johnnyb588
    you forgot the flesh slapping sounds
  • Abuse
    Brian's Mojito wrote...
    azgbayfan
    Rush to judgement? Paterno was told by McQueary that the shower incident was of "a sexual nature," according to PATERNO's testimony UNDER OATH. Louis Freeh wanted to interview Paterno for his report and he said no. He facilitated a child molester when he could have stopped him. Penn State isn't even responding to this stupid family investigation.
  • Abuse
    johnnyb588 wrote...
    Whatashame
    And you're forgetting the part where McQueary himself said he wasn't 100% sure what he saw was rape. Again, hindsight being what it is, it's easy to say we all would have done something different, but I doubt many of the lynch mob would have done any better.
  • Abuse
    Warpig wrote...
    Wolfe
    You continuously prove your a goof ball , your pontifications are that of higher morality than you actually posses. If it was your dad what would you say and do and I do believe JOP P got rail roaded. The family is doing the right thing and sedning the right message , you just don't like the truth. The media never likes the truth.
close

Share: