Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close
NEW YORK (AP) — Hockey is back, and it took nearly four months and one long night to get the game back on the ice.

With the season on the line, the NHL and the players' association agreed on a tentative pact to end a 113-day lockout and save what was left of a fractured schedule.

Commissioner Gary Bettman and union executive director Donald Fehr ceased being adversaries and announced the deal while standing side by side near a wall toward the back of the negotiating room and showing a tinge of weariness.

"I want to thank Don Fehr," Bettman said. "We went through a tough period, but it's good to be at this point."

A marathon negotiating session that lasted more than 16 hours, stretching from Saturday afternoon until just before dawn Sunday, produced a 10-year deal.

"We've got to dot a lot of Is and cross a lot of Ts," Bettman said. "There's still a lot of work to be done, but the basic details of the agreement have been agreed upon."

Even players who turned into negotiators showed the strain of the long, difficult process.

"It was a battle," said Winnipeg Jets defenseman Ron Hainsey, a key member of the union's bargaining team. "Gary said a month ago it was a tough negotiation. That's what it was.

"Players obviously would rather not have been here, but our focus now is to give the fans whatever it is — 48 games, 50 games — the most exciting season we can. The mood has been nervous for a while. You want to be playing. You want to be done with this."

The collective bargaining agreement must be ratified by a majority of the league's 30 owners and the union's membership of approximately 740 players.

"Hopefully within a very few days the fans can get back to watching people who are skating, not the two of us," Fehr said.

All schedule issues, including the length of the season, still need to be worked out. The NHL has models for 50- and 48-game seasons.

The original estimate was regular-season games could begin about eight days after a deal was reached. It is believed that all games will be played within the two respective conferences, but that also hasn't been decided.

The players have been locked out since Sept. 16, the day after the previous agreement expired. That deal came after an extended lockout that wiped out the entire 2004-05 season.

"Any process like this is difficult. It can be long," Fehr said.

Time was clearly a factor, with the sides facing a deadline of Thursday or Friday to reach a deal that would allow for a 48-game season to start a week later. Bettman had said the league could not allow a season of fewer than 48 games per team.

All games through Jan. 14, along with the All-Star game and the New Year's Day Winter Classic had already been canceled, claiming more than 50 percent of the original schedule.

Without an agreement, the NHL faced the embarrassment of losing two seasons due to a labor dispute, something that has never happened in another North American sports league. The 2004-05 season was lost while the sides negotiated hockey's first salary cap.

Under the new CBA, free-agent contracts will have a maximum length of seven years, but clubs can go to eight years to re-sign their own players. Each side can opt out of the deal after eight years.

The pension plan was "the centerpiece of the deal for the players," Hainsey said.

The actual language of the pension plan still has to be written, but Hainsey added there is nothing substantial that needs to be fixed.

The players' share of hockey-related income, a total that reached a record $3.3 billion last season, will drop from 57 percent to a 50-50 split. The salary cap for the upcoming season will be $70.2 million and will then go down to $64.3 million in the 2013-14 season.

All clubs must have a minimum payroll of $44 million.

The league had wanted next season's cap to fall to $60 million, but agreed to an upper limit of $64.3 — the same amount as last season.

Inside individual player contracts, the salary can't vary more than 35 percent year to year, and the final year can't be more than 50 percent of the highest year.

A decision on whether NHL players will participate in the 2014 Olympics will be made apart from the CBA. While it is expected that players will take part, the IOC and the International Ice Hockey Federation will have discussions with the league and the union before the matter is settled.

After the sides stayed mostly apart for two days, following late-night talks that turned sour, federal mediator Scot Beckenbaugh worked virtually around the clock to get everyone back to the bargaining table.

This time it worked — early on the 113th day of the work stoppage.

George Cohen, the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service director, called the deal "the successful culmination of a long and difficult road."

"Of course, the agreement will pave the way for the professional players to return to the ice and for the owners to resume their business operations," he said in a statement. "But the good news extends beyond the parties directly involved; fans throughout North America will have the opportunity to return to a favorite pastime and thousands of working men and women and small businesses will no longer be deprived of their livelihoods."

Before the sides ever came to an understanding regarding a 50-50 split of hockey-related revenues, the NHL first tried to cut the players' share from 57 percent to 46 percent.

A series of talks in the first couple of weeks of September don't bring the sides any closer, and the board of governors gave Bettman the authority to lock out the players at midnight on Sept. 15.

There was optimism about an end for the lockout when the sides held talks in New York on Dec. 5-6. The roller coaster took the participants and the fans on an up-and-down thrill ride that ended in major disappointment.

Fehr painted a picture that the sides were close to a deal, and Bettman chastised him for getting people's hopes up. Negotiations broke off, and the NHL announced it was pulling all offers off the table.

It wasn't until Beckenbaugh's determined effort in the final two days of the prolonged negotiations that the sides finally found common ground.

"We were making progress continually and to make a deal you have to continue to make progress until it's over," Hainsey said. "That finally happened today."

9 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    ex-distancerunner wrote...
    Lets Go Coyotes!!!!!!!!
    I got to meet "Howler" at a running road race yesterday..Can't wait for the season to start!!!! Another great part of an exciting great city (tough to drive to though from Mesa, cant wait for the light rail) and thanks to the city of Glendale for hosting them.
  • Abuse
    1redcav wrote...
    Who cares?
    Hockey sucks!
  • Abuse
    Lee A. wrote...
    Thanks for the Relevant Input...
    ... 1redcav. On the agreement itself, I don't know who's worse: the NHL league officials/owners/union or the WashDC politicians. This should have been done long ago and the fans deserve better than two horrible season stoppages in the last 10 years. Regardless, I'm glad they're coming back, just in time for the end of football season. Go Yotes!
  • Abuse
    Hummer71 wrote...
    Finally
    About dang time. I will make a few games from the East valley. Folks, go see this team. They deserve the support after this drama of the last few years.
  • Abuse
    Tennisgrandpa wrote...
    Big Deal
    The NHL has lost me as a fan forever. I will NEVER watch another game, I won't even watch the scores on the news. The NHL can pound sand, or ice in this case.
    Dale
  • Abuse
    Tennisgrandpa wrote...
    and....
    Doesn't it bother you that these players and owners rely on fans sheep-like tendancies and use the fans as leverage to get what they want? There's nothing worse than getting played as a sucker. What I would love to see is nationwide at the first game back in every city, just before they drop the puck, all of the fans get up and walk out. Now THAT would be a statement, but most fans don't have that sort of conviction. That's why I'll never watch a game again because I don't know what pizzes me off worse, the players and owners using fans or the fans lack of a spine.
    Dale
  • Abuse
    ex-distancerunner wrote...
    No, it really dosen't bother me at all
    I use professional sports and arts organizations as entertainment. I enjoy watching people who are great at their kraft. I don't use them for role models or anything else and if you've ever lived in a part of the country (most of the country) with no sports teams and the only form of entertainment are 4-H fairs where people go to watch animals defecating in the middle of some ring, you know exactly how great it is to live in a place like this..just my opinion.
  • Abuse
    Tennisgrandpa wrote...
    I did but...
    I grew up in a small Indiana town of about 18,000 people, saw all of what 4H had to offer. But being entertained at the cost of the rich getting richer just rubs me the wrong way. I love living here, been here for 39 years but I can also find other avenues of entertainment here tos where I don't get played as a sucker so those athletes can make their Bentley payments. I choose to be a role model, I don't need to support athletes and owners that are greedy
    Dale
  • Abuse
    ex-distancerunner wrote...
    Yeah me too...Oolitic Indiana..maybe 1000 people
    2 years here for me. I don't begrudge those guys for doing the best for themselves as I would try to do for me and my family. They deserve it. They deserve what they get and what I am willing to pay for their services. Just like anybody else.. In a big hockey market, boycotting these great athletes wouldn't hurt anybody and not send much of a message. In the Phoenix market (which is the joke of Hockey News, see todays Ken Campbell article) The only real victims would be the sporting fans of Phoenix, who would only validate the Hockey News notions. I understand the anger though.
Standings
Schedule
Team Leaders
close

Share: