Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close

When the NHL lockout began, I can't help but admit that a small portion of me was excited.

As someone who is (sometimes) paid to cover the Phoenix Coyotes, that probably doesn't seem natural, but allow me to further my thought. I hoped the lockout would give officials in the City of Glendale a sneak peek at what life without hockey would be like, what the massive losses at stake would be like and the damage those losses could do to the city's already struggling economy.

So, Glendale, have we learned our lesson yet?

One of the highest-grossing Westgate bars during games, McFadden's, said they are losing between $18,000 and $32,000 per game missed.

Rumors have circulated about businesses eyeing other locations in an attempt to chase profits. In a dying shopping center, who can blame them? Businesses aren't charities, they need to make money to survive. Without a hockey team at Jobing.com Arena, they're not making enough.

The city estimates the tax revenue alone from each game missed is in the neighborhood of $60,000. I can't certify it, but I'm guessing it's much, much higher.

As Glendale faces yet another vote on the Coyotes' future in the Valley, it would be a wonder why they would consider turning down a restructured arena management fee with prospective owner Greg Jamison. The city can't survive astronomical loss like that, especially considering it is already in debt.

Some may argue that the city could find another group to manage the arena that would bring in concerts, expos or other events to fill nights left vacant by a departed Coyotes team. Pipe dreams are nice. There are a finite number of events that could book in the Valley and Glendale faces steep opposition from numerous other cities and venues.

The Coyotes guarantee 41 home games in a regular season, in addition to preseason and postseason games, along with other team-related events. Any arena management group would be challenged to fill those extra nights in addition to months when hockey is out of season. Granted, they would be required to pay a certain fee if they do not book the arena a specified amount of nights, but that makes me wonder just how many groups would be willing to accept that challenge.

Also, Glendale does not work at the speed of light. If the city chooses to find a new arena management group, how long will it take for it to sit down, consider the offers and make a deal? If the failed Coyotes deals of times past teach us anything, residents are in for a long, long wait.

Without the Coyotes and relying solely on the Cardinals and college bowl games, Westgate is doomed. There simply is not a large enough revenue stream that can be generated by the surrounding community and another arena management group. While the NHL is currently locked out, Glendale would be wise to approve the restructured arena deal and establish their future as one that has embraced hockey, rather than one that throws their hopes on the shoulders of another group and hopes things work out for the best.

Glendale, I sure hope you've learned your lesson and consider it before the upcoming vote. You're bleeding money at an alarming rate and one can only wonder how long it will be before you decide to staunch the bleeding.

15 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    AZCrazy wrote...
    economic
    You are right in that the biggest part of the problem is not that the West side can't support a team. There are plenty of people with plenty of money on the West side, and a lot higher density of them. The problem is that this big expensive arena was built and the supporting business built all around, hadn't yet begun to service their debt when the national economy imploded. Deep recessions are a horrible time to have enormous overhead.
  • Abuse
    Teddy P wrote...
    Rob
    It isn't an argument, it is a fact. This team had solid attendance in downtown Phoenix, but is financially failing in Glendale. The average weekday worker in the East Valley does not want to drive out there for a weekday game and attendance how shown that. I enjoy the Coyotes and don't want them to go either. However, I just don't know how they can survive with that arena being out there.
  • Abuse
    sundevil7901 wrote...
    Veering away from sports a bit
    But the answer for Westgate's survival would be for Glendale to allow the tribal casino to open up down the road. Let the native emericans open the casio and work a deal to co-advertise with Westgate as sort of a mega-entertainment area.Between that and the new mall next to Westagate, business will boom for Westgate with or without hockey.
  • Abuse
    sundevil7901 wrote...
    Americans not emericans
    My spelling is bad but I just had to correct that one, my bad.
  • Abuse
    Todd S. wrote...
    Narrow Minded View
    As with most Coyote supporters this portrays a very black and white view of "Keep the Coyotes, or lose everything." Over 25 years ago the Roadrunners averaged over 8,500 per game, easily drawing over 12,000 on weekend games, long before the media condescended to cover the sport of hockey at all. Westgate is suffering this year because there are no events. Even with just a minor league hockey team in place, the difference in attendance would not even be noticeable, not to mention other events that a management group would bring. There are other options believe it or not.
Standings
Schedule
Team Leaders
close

Share: