Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close
In the dying days of the Ken Whisenhunt-Rod Graves era, there was some considerable effort made to explain the state of the Arizona Cardinals franchise and, more importantly, why it was where it was.

"No quarterback, no chance," might be a fair précis of their appraisal, and the name "Kevin Kolb" in no way included in their solution. Since then, the incumbency suffered two significant losses to its ranks, leaving the surviving member very motivated to pull the plug on the experiment that ended the long tenures of his predecessors.

New general manager Steve Keim's decision to release the Cardinals former "franchise quarterback" will undoubtedly reinvigorate the type of debate that helped secure Kevin Kolb's services in the first place. After all, a year of laughable quarterback play (vide Derek Anderson, Max Hall and John Skelton's collective 2010 output) can do more than just ensure a top 10 draft selection; it can lead to a hasty solution.

Desperate to secure Kolb's services during an already frenetic 2011 post-lockout offseason, the Cardinals met Andy Reid's demands very quickly. Probably too quickly. Among those questioning the move or, more precisely, the "market price" for an unproven starting quarterback was (then) NFL Network analyst Michael Lombardi:

"I don't know how you can be sold on Kevin Kolb…You've got seven games to sell yourself on. Three he played well. Four not so good. He's a prospect. You're buying him on potential. Which is fine. You've got to be able to do what he does well. That starts with protecting him."

And while the Cardinals certainly did little to protect their investment (Kolb was sacked 57 times in two years), Lombardi's initial criticism remains his most salient one. During Kolb's two seasons in Arizona, he started 14 games, doubling the sample size referenced by Lombardi. Kolb's record as a starter went from 3-4 in Philly to 6-8 with the Cardinals. His quarterback rating went from 81.8 as Eagles starter to 82.1 as Arizona's. For some statistical context, an 82 QB rating would place Kolb 19th among qualified passers during that three-year span. But this assumes too much -- namely the type of durability it takes to make such a comparison. For example, the minimum number of attempts for a qualified passer from 2010-12 was the Colts' Curtis Painter with 243 in 2011. Kolb averaged 208 pass attempts per season during that span, and 218 during the last two years in Arizona. (Kolb was healthy about 44 percent of his time as starter in Arizona.)

The final returns from the Kevin Kolb era reveal a quarterback who was fairly serviceable when he played, and unavailable fairly often; a résumé as overrated as the decision to be rid of it.

Rod Lakin, Producer - Burns & Gambo

8 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    CardsFan_ wrote...
    Is there a point to this article?
    I'm having trouble making it out. Is it that letting Kolb go isn't really a tough call? If so, the article's analysis lacks context - mainly, it's as much about the Cardinals' alternatives as it is about Kolb's performance, but also about the nature of his injury and durability. Brushing off the sacks he took is too simplistic - any QB will go down if they get pummeled enough - and I'm not sure his last injury was a durability issue. Bottom line is, I feel our best QB option just walked out the door, and that keeps this from being the easy call Lakin seems to be making it out to be.
  • Abuse
    TempeCardsFan wrote...
    In the final analysis . . .
    losing Kevin Kolb as QB of the Cards is a lot like losing that girlfriend you went out with for a couple of times, and had just an OK time . . . If you don't really miss her that much, I guess that's a sign that she/(he) really wasn't the right one for you (or the Cards)!
  • Abuse
    Steve L. wrote...
    @ CardsFan
    I agree wholeheartedly.
  • Abuse
    Fangdango wrote...
    Might he have been better than fairly serviceable?
    Had he got a training camp to learn the offense prior to his first season here and got some help from the O-line? I don't think anybody still really knows what Kolb could be if he got some time in a system, some protection and remained healthy.
  • Abuse
    Sillysoft wrote...
    Kolb was a big unknown
    No one could know how well he could of done with another year and better protection, so you say to yourself do I want to spend a ton of money on a guy with a lot of questions? Or do I just cut him and go with another guy who a lot of questions but allows more flexibility in case it doesnt work out?
  • Abuse
    Guyinaz wrote...
    .
    First, sorry Rod, please stick to calling the drive time traffic - no offense as I agree with the points others made on the substance of this article. Second, your point that "Kolb was healthy about 44 percent of his time as starter.." I really have no idea what this even means. Do you not recall Kolb beinging benched for Skelton while he was healthy? Sorry man, the stat details started to go somewhere but that quickly faded into a head scratcher
  • Abuse
    ntmid8r3 wrote...
    It was the easiest call.....
    when you consider the pay he was getting for the performance he gave. Yes, he did get sacked a lot BUT I would be willing to bet that he caused approximately 1/4 of the sacks by not moving around when the pressure was coming. He took the Cardinals organization for 20 million dollars.Stanton will surprise, Hoyer will also be good. We all know that Piss-N-Punt didn't have the proper coaches in place to succeed. I am hoping that B.A. has a plan & although it may be a couple of years away, the Cardinals will rise back to the top of the NFC West. Now, LET'S FIX THAT O-LINE!!!!!
  • Abuse
    LiveForSports wrote...
    Cut Losses
    Bottom line was Kolb could not stay healthy and was never spectacular enough to suggest he might be able to win 10-11 games and get the Cards to the playoffs. And the other guys could onle.muster something like 2 TD's an 17 INT's. Time to clean house and start over at QB. Let's hope they get lucky in the draft like San Fran and Seattle did, or Hoyer and Stanton surprise us.
close

Share: