Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close
Alexsmith02ap.JPG
(AP Photo/Jeff Chiu)
I'd like to think I'm an optimistic guy. I own several ‘Life is Good' t-shirts to prove it.

But when it comes to the possibility of the Niners shipping Alex Smith to their division rival the Cardinals, I tend to agree with NFL.com's Ian Rapoport's assessment of the Cardinals own opinion on the subject:

Very pessimistic.

The idea of the 49ers feeling this sudden surge of charity towards Smith (by trading him to an ideal spot) and the Cardinals (by giving their rival the QB they need) seems foreign. Division rivals trade players to each other all the time. The Eagles traded McNabb to the Redskins to the surprise of most.

The Suns traded Steve Nash to the Lakers for goodness sakes. It happens.

But in both of those circumstances the trade wasn't really affecting the rivalry. Philly knew McNabb was washed up and that the Redskins were no good anyway. No harm, no foul. Same applies to the Suns, except they were the ones who realized they weren't good enough to be in active competition with the Lakers for a Pacific Division title. Again, what's the harm?

But I have to think the Niners would look at the Cardinals and how many games they could have won last year if they just got decent -- not great, just decent -- play out of the QB last year. And Alex Smith, on his worst day, is a decent quarterback. The Cards have many leaks to plug; I just can't see the 49ers providing the thumb to plug their biggest.

Worst case scenario, as ESPN's Mike Sando suggested, the Cardinals will provide the Niners with more leverage to squeeze a better draft pick out of whatever team they do trade Smith to.

Now there is a report from CBS Sports' Jason LaCanfora (the Django Unchained of NFL reporters....good but not THAT good) that says the Cards' offer for Smith was "weak".

As much as I hate to admit it, I'm beginning to give more and more thought to Gambo's idea about the Cardinals going after New England's Ryan Mallett. Tom Brady is clearly not going anywhere, so Mallett really isn't being groomed for any type of promotion. He's got the cannon arm Bruce Arians has implied he's looking for. By sheer osmosis, whatever attitude problems he had coming into the draft should have been cured by hanging with Brady. The Patriots only have five draft picks this year so they'd be looking to add. Oh, and Cards personnel man Jason Licht was employed by New England when they drafted Mallett.

If you're going to select a quarterback with your 2nd or 3rd round pick anyway, can you get one who is better than Mallett? In this draft? Questionable at best.

Dave Burns, Co-host of Burns & Gambo

3 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    Hummer71 wrote...
    Had to chuckle
    I'm a big Cards fan but I had to laugh when I saw the quote that the "Cards offer was weak". Doesn't that just sound like the Cards. From first RD picks to Free Agents to the city of Flagstaff and now SF. The Cards always low ball everyone at least at first. Then out of the blue they throw money at Kolb and Jake Plummer years ago. I don't get them sometimes.
  • Abuse
    DisgustedD wrote...
    Hummer
    Why chuckle? Start a negotiation low & go from there. The 49ers are leveraging the Cards to up the anti on Smith anyway. They would rather see him go to the Chiefs or Browns.
  • Abuse
    AZSPORTFAN wrote...
    @ Burns
    It would seem that if the Cardinals did make an offer for Smith, that Arians and his staff isn't sold on Kolb being the starting QB this year. I personally think Kolb is better than most think and probably just as good as Smith with the right o-line. If the Cardinals do go in a different direction other than Kolb, I would then absolutely go after Mallet. It sure looks like Kolb is going to be released ............... I hope not
close

Share: