Login

Register | Forgot Your Password? | Close
AP: a76523e8-2e40-4704-8844-80cfbcdb4fb5
Detroit Lions wide receiver Calvin Johnson (81) cannot pull in a pass as Arizona Cardinals cornerback Patrick Peterson (21) defends during the first half of an NFL football game on Sunday, Dec. 16, 2012, in Glendale, Ariz. (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin)
No one is saying Arizona Cardinals cornerback Patrick Peterson has not had a good year.

A second-year pro, Peterson has picked off seven passes while collecting 53 tackles. He's been regularly matched up with the opponent's best receiver, and for the most part done an excellent job keeping them in check.

Peterson's effort this season was rewarded with a spot in the Pro Bowl, his second trip in as many seasons (first as a cornerback).

NFL.com's Greg Rosenthal believes the former first-round pick has been fine, but should not be heading to Hawaii. Instead, he believes Seattle's Richard Sherman should have gotten the nod.

It's an absolute joke that Patrick Peterson made the NFC team over Sherman. Peterson is a very talented cornerback and improved this season for the Arizona Cardinals, but his play was too up and down. We'd also put Antoine Winfield on the team over Tim Jennings or Peterson, although Jennings was plenty worthy.

A second-year pro himself, Sherman has tallied 61 tackles to go with seven interceptions this season. One of the best corners in the game, he recently won an appeal for what would have been a suspension due to use of performance-enhancing drugs. A case can certainly be made for Sherman's inclusion on the NFC roster, and that he wasn't is a bit of a shame.

ProFootballFocus.com ranks the former Stanford Cardinal second among cornerbacks, whereas the Arizona Cardinal Peterson comes in at 14th.

The players have comparable stats, though Sherman's team has been far more successful than Peterson's. Did the PED allegations play a role in the Seahawk being snubbed? Perhaps.

But either way it is Peterson who will be representing the NFC in Honolulu.

4 Comments   |   Join the conversation »
  • Add A Comment 
  • Abuse
    DisgustedD wrote...
    Okay
    Yeah well Winfield is typically hurt & is overrated! PP has made great strides & is deserving. Sherman is deserving as well but he would need to replace Jennings not PP!
  • Abuse
    FitzIsMyHero wrote...
    Sherman was taking PED's
    He proved the sample was mishandled. Thats what millions of dollars paid to very minipulative attorneys can do for you. Johnny Cochran got OJ out of murder!
  • Abuse
    StubbyJ23 wrote...
    Sherman Didn't deserve
    The fact that he won his appeal by proving the sample was mishandled is crap anyway. Instead of giving him the appeal, make him take another test under EXTREME scrutiny so he has nothing to appeal. It does not prove that he was not taking PEDs, it just proves he had a real good lawyer. The tool does not deserve to be in the Pro Bowl, he deserves to be benched for the playoffs. The League needs to take a look at how they handle appeals for PED use. Just give them another test instead of an appeal if they don't like the first one.
  • Abuse
    Tennisgrandpa wrote...
    How many?
    Try doing it without the roids and quit paying off the test lab workers to contaminate the samples. Cheat! But why is that surprising when the head coach is a documented cheat? oh, and Rosenthal is an idiot.
    Dale
close

Share: